Updated:2024-10-24 02:45 Views:86
Jessica Gunning (left) and Richard Gadd attend Netflix’s “Baby Reindeer” ATAS official screening at DGA Theater Complex on May 7, 2024, in Los Angeles, California. Image: Emma McIntyre/Getty Images via AFP
Netflix has lost its bid to throw out a defamation lawsuit filed by the woman who says she was the inspiration for the stalker in the Emmy-winning hit “Baby Reindeer.”
The streaming giant had asked a judge to toss the suit brought by Fiona Harvey, who has identified herself as the real-life “Martha,” the delusional, violent and abusive woman at the center of Richard Gadd’s global television phenomenon.
Article continues after this advertisementThe show, which has been seen by millions around the world and won six Emmys, claims in its opening episode to be “a true story” — a characterization that has landed it in legal trouble after the script did not strictly hew to real-life events.
FEATURED STORIES ENTERTAINMENT Alodia Gosiengfiao on her first pregnancy: ‘It’s a lot of work but exciting’ ENTERTAINMENT ‘Bling Empire’ star Kevin Kreider honored to join ‘Hello, Love, Again’ cast ENTERTAINMENT Loisa Andalio hopes to inspire young ones in esports film ‘Friendly Fire’The seven-episode series, which is based on Gadd’s one-man play, follows a fictionalized version of the writer who meets a woman in the pub where he works.
What unspools is a deeply disturbing, yearslong ordeal for Gadd in which Martha sends thousands of emails, texts and voice messages as she harasses him, his girlfriend and his family.
Article continues after this advertisementMartha, whom the show portrays as having been previously convicted for stalking a lawyer, is also shown to sexually assault Gadd.
Article continues after this advertisementNetflix had argued that it could not be sued for defamation because the events depicted in the series were “substantially true,” and that in any case viewers would know it was not entirely factual because it was a drama.
Article continues after this advertisementThe streamer had offered as evidence the fact that Harvey had been investigated for stalking, had touched Gadd sexually without his consent and had shoved him.
However, a judge in California ruled that there were considerable deviations between real-life events and those served up to viewers.
Article continues after this advertisement“There are major differences between inappropriate touching and sexual assault, as well as between shoving and gouging another’s eyes,” wrote Judge Gary Klausner, in a ruling published Friday.
“There is a major difference between stalking and being convicted of stalking in a court of law.”
The ruling cited an article in Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper that quoted entertainment industry sources saying that Gadd had been concerned that Netflix was presenting the series as “a true story,” rather than “based on a true story.”
That Netflix carried on anyway “suggests a reckless disregard” of facts, Klausner wrote.
“While the statements were made in a series that largely has the trappings of a black comedy-drama, the very first episode states unequivocally that ‘this is a true story,’ thereby inviting the audience to accept the statements as fact.”
The ruling means Harvey’s claim for defamation in California can proceed.
However, her claims for negligence, gross negligence and a request for punitive damages were dismissed.
In a statement to AFP, Netflix said it would continue to contest the defamation claim.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
“We intend to defend this matter vigorously and to stand by Richard Gadd’s right to tell his storylvbet,” the statement said.
READ NEXT Michael V’s parody version of BINI’s ‘Salamin, Salam... Rebel Wilson marries girlfriend Ramona Agruma in Sardinia, Italy EDITORS' PICK Espenido retracts drug-related allegations vs De Lima Marcos smiled, walked away when asked about VP Duterte’s accusation WPS: US missile deployment to PH key for combat readiness – US general Sandro Marcos calls out VP Sara Duterte: ‘You crossed the line’ Tropical Storm Kristine slightly intensifies; Signal No. 2 in 5 areas LIVE UPDATES: Tropical Storm Kristine MOST READ SC issues TRO vs Comelec resolution on dismissed public officials Tropical Storm Kristine slightly intensifies; Signal No. 2 in 5 areas LIVE UPDATES: Tropical Storm Kristine Walang Pasok: Class suspensions on Wednesday, Oct. 23 View comments